The X-T4 might seem expensive for an APS-C camera in the era of (comparatively) low cost full-frame, but few cameras offer its combination of stills and video capabilities. Has anyone upgraded from XT1 to XT4? Speaking as a photographer of birds and other wildlife, I love the top dials. To me the correct response would be that this is a very capable camera, but of course more can be done. I think this is the one of most balanced cameras ever made, joining older cameras such as the Panasonic GH5 and the Sony A7III. In the meantime, angled connectors will keep your cables out of the way. That's why I have an X-H1 for lenses like the 16-55mm f/2.8. There are lots of excellent professional commercial work, creative work, and great artwork made with mobile phones and small sensor compact cameras. The weird thing about Sony is that they don't have a great 24-70 or 70-200 lens...and those are two of the most important lenses for any system. It does not get in the way of tripod mounting or battery removal. I did find the film plane mark. Strictly speaking, it's more accurate to say that FF can offer better image quality than APS-C. Its amazing burst rate, excellent tracking abilities (with the right lens! NOT because it is no good camera.But for the sole reason Fujifilm next camera (X-H2) will offer a new sensor and processor. I haven't had the opportunity to use the X-T4 in heavy precipitation, but had absolutely no hesitation to put the camera under the kitchen faucet for a test. (Same for GFX, where he will say that HRFF creeps up on it fast for less money). Once can very inexpensively make an X-T3 feel like an X-T4. Worth the spend? angelo: Well, you might do that yourself :-)A6600 & 1655 = 2300 Euro only new availableSony A7III & 24105 = 1848 + 1049 Euro new = 2900, used 2500 Euro Fuji XT4 & 1655 = 1824 + 1050 Euro new = 2874 Euro, couldn't find used prices for the lensSo the XT4 is straight in FF territory price-wise, a used FF will undercut it as will the Nikon/Canon FF offerings. You also have 18mp in apsc crop mode if you need extra flexibility. Building upon the features of its predecessors, the X-T4 impresses across the board. As a camera/gear maker, should target produce more better gear than previous even for use by normal user. they get now a better AF and IBIS (until now they had to choose between X-H1 and X-T3). Well the X-T4 is selling well regardless. Ignoring its score, the X-H1 is fairly inexpensive these days so it does offer a lot of value. Thanks for the link. I have the 56mm f1.2 with the XT3 and it's quite fast to focus. Fuji tech has no answer or is not knowledgeable as she said I’ll be back with you but 6minutes on music means dum. Sometimes a section, say the video page, will be written by someone else, to allow the lead reviewer to concentrate on other aspects of the camera. The best cameras for under $1000 should have good ergonomics and controls, great image quality and be capture high-quality video. Good question Magnar - Why do people buy Sony APS-C cameras in the first place with their smaller sensor and all the crap you are talking about. This has been discussed for a very long time, and there are people who will not use anything but C1 and other people don't have a problem with LR (and an adjusted import profile). sony a.i. Adjust the price maybeFF ain't no mecca, but there is a lot of FF glass around using adapters can be fun/super cheap way to get some lenses.IMO Fuji should have done FF and crop run both side by side, Ignore @maxxun fan... he's either a troll, or just someone who doesn't get it... there are other posts where he claims he bought and used the Fuji 16-80mm, but refused to say what body he used it with. It also adds vertical shooting controls, increasing appeal to photographers who prefer a larger camera, not just those who want to go longer without changing batteries. He's trolled people in Canon and Nikon forums as well - making strong claims, but refusing to back it up with evidence and demanding people "do research.". Honestly price is something that doesn't bother me (obviously since I like X-Pros :D ). I bought the Sigma 56F1.4 for 370 Euro for the A6600, too, so that illustrates it quite well :-). I own an X-T3 and I scanned this review to see if the menus have been improved. The camera locks on consistently, identifies and tracks moving subjects, and offers face and eye detection. Shame because it hampers what might be a good camera. Fuji is also offering 200€ for that matter, and directly on the invoice. The X-T4 looks compelling. Bluetooth is included, but not for wireless audio. Instead, the camera has a dedicated Movie mode, accessible via the Still/Movie switch, nested under the shutter dial. Here are some of our favorites. The X-T4 now takes the title, as well as out highest possible rating, and is the camera to beat in this class. The X-T4 body is $1,699, which is $200 more than the original price of the X-T3. My point was exactly that the XT4 (and mostly the XT3 too) is forfeiting all these points and is directly comparable to a FF setup. "Now say the same over color rendering and colorscience. " Again, you get to choose to gain IQ at the cost of features such as AF going to a GFX 50R. The 5D series does have a great balance to it. For that matter, I find the Canon 1DX and the Nikon D(n) series feel very balanced as well. So let's not pretend that AF in video is the most important thing for serious videographers. and i LOVE the handling. ), and solid sensor performance really set it apart for me. I found a used X-H1 with a 23 F2 which I didn't yet have and a bunch of manual focus lenses for under $1k, putting the body at roughly $500, best purchase I've ever made. Perceivement of an image is 1000% more important than a fancy AF. Just what Nikon needs right now! Image quality is another plus—it's as good as you'll get without moving up to a full-frame model, and Fuji's film emulations are absolutely lovely, with enough variety to cover a wide range of looks. Enjoy! Noone is talking about the fuji worms. I am sure I will have more as I use it. You can select any of these focus modes via the Q menu. But in my tests, I think the output is better than XTransformer and even capture 1- although I’m sure someone proficient with C1 could yield equal results. the main draw is on the basis of 10 vs 8 bit codecs, and 7.5 (and over more useful) vs 6.5 stop Ibis. Now, three months later, the company has confirmed in a statement that the personal information of past and current employees was taken from its servers. I also always consider fully articulated screen is "con" and wish they don't put it on all the models. After all, most of the camera brands have already perfected the functionality of the mentioned features. Take a closer look. I've only had the body for a few days -- very pleased with it so far. Compact and relatively fast E-mount primes are plenty Sony 20 1.8, Sony 24 1.4, Sony 50 1.8, Zeiss-Sony 55 1.8, Sony & Batis 85 1.8, Sony 135 1.8. There are similar good deals like a X-T30 + 15-45mm at 400€-ish (one store only in Switzerland, don't know how they do it...). IBIS makes them more useful. They complained it was too big and had old hardware, they put everything into the X-T4. People who buy Sony cameras are able to add their own color science to the images in post. @User - Since the system is APS-C, I think you mean the 8-16 f2.8. Best apsc camera and system you can buy right meow.. Touchscreen/menus have none of the above issues. Also Fujifilm also left out the little plastic clip to attach the strap and the hinge of the LCD screen feels like it can break anytime. The statement doesn't say the Fujifilm has smaller, lighter lenses that allow the same amount of light. Why would I need a run-of-the-mill FF camera when I have the best APS-C camera? The 65mm T2 completes Vazen's set of anamorphic lenses for the Micro Four Thirds system. A92, A7R4, A7R3, 600MM f/4, 300 MM f/2.8, 100-400MM, 70-200MM f/2.8, etc. Hahaha, Fuji haters are always funny. It's just videos that keep pushing my boundaries now! Do we have zoom lenses the size of a Fuji 18-55mm? Fujifilm has officially announced the X-T4 and to me it looks like a brilliant camera. The autofocus on the A7Riv is in a different league than the Fufi, but the Fuji is the one that gets used the most. The X-T4 launched at $300 less than the Fujifilm X-H1, yet is a better camera in every way except for the lack of a top LCD display. It brings in-body stabilization, faster shooting, improved autofocus and a larger battery to the already very capable X-T3. Otherwise, consider the X-T3. Well - you are comparing the top of the line camera from Fuji to a mid-tier camera from Nikon. Sigma's new primes promise very good performance and light weight, when paired with L-mount and Sony E-mount mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras. The most dramatic drop is X-H1. Is the Fujifilm X-T4 the king of APS-C cameras? Current Fujifilm owners should consider upgrading if they want the hybrid and video-centric updates. If you go outside of Fujis closed ecosystem with their rather expensive lenses, then APSC still can be an option to save weight and cost. For instance, if I were talking about soccer legend Pelé I might say, “Yeah, he can shoot a little bit” as a way of telling you that I believe his artistry on the field will never be matched, ever.So when I say Benjamin does nice work, that means I think his talent is outrageous and I am especially in awe of the way he creates such a relaxed, effortless look on what I assume are heavily produced shoots. CIPA's latest report for global camera shipments shows the camera industry is gaining pace once again in a year marred by the COVID-19 pandemic atop a market already in decline. There are plenty of other buttons too, and most can be customized—the only exceptions are Display/Back, Delete, Menu/OK, and Play. X-T100 is worse. It packs 1.6 million dots into a 3-inch frame. If Sony sell expensive, can find China OLED oem. A higher signal to noise ratio gives you a less noisy representation of the scene, and better definition of the tonal differences that appear in the scene. Like I said at a price (right price) crop is fine. The reason why Fujifilm colours are being praised by most people is because they have over 80 years of experience in color science. The Primoplan 75mm F1.9 II is a redesign of the original Primoplan 75mm F1.9 designed in 1936. It's available in Canon EF, Fuji X, Leica M, M42, MFT, Nikon F, Pentax K and Sony E mounts and the first units are expected to ship in January 2021. It has the sensor of the XT-2, which might not be that fast focusing on action but it is a great travel and scenic camera. Detail suffers and noise increases at higher ones. With default noise reduction applied, there's some loss of fine detail at ISO 6400 and 12800, but you can dial back noise reduction if you want more detail, though with it comes some image noise. @vegataleb The XT4 is a top of the range aps-c. I shoot a couple of A7Rii’s as I need the resolution for large prints and it’s better for lowlight work. How does the actual quality of the lenses compare? Our team from DPReview TV has been shooting a production Fujifilm X-T4 all week. And wide open at 1.2 mine is as sharp as the Canon 85mm f1.4 I used to own with my 5DIII. And only use the larger stuff for occasional projects. Stabilisation is not for everyone though and Fuji do nice kit but no evidence yet that stabilising these larger sensors is going to be easy or at all affordable. $1900 at release was totally not going to fly for an APS-C camera. You can also get a kit with the 18-55mm F/2.8-4.0 OIS lens, which is what Fujifilm sent me, for $2,099. Give the Sony a9II a try, it might be the perfect fit with better IQ, AF, speed, lenses, etc, etc... X-H1 or wait for X-H2. In many circumstances you may be able to set the APS-C camera to equivalent settings and get comparable image quality. Our expert industry analysis and practical solutions help you make better buying decisions and get more from technology. they focused on video quality until they are behind in AF. And for your information the GFX relating to your story also always win about your beloved Sony system. Of course they cost tens of thousands of dollars and are used to film most Hollywood movies. Apart from the M4/3 size and articulated screen, what I really love is my Leica 42.5mm f1.2 it is a fab lens for portraits etc - all the other M4/3 lenses I have are so so. Dr. H,I commented just before you and will try to see if I can help. Most people do photography for the fun of it; why use equipment that makes it less fun and more laborious? Anyway, I can't believe the anti Sony garbage posted here. Get a £10 good quality screen protector, I had Expert shield on many cameras and never had an issue with scratches. And that is true with many other lenses, the size and weight differences are getting smaller. IQ hasn't really improved along the XT line since the XT1 (which is extremely close to the 24+ mp Fujis); if you're a stills shooter on a budget any of the cameras including the XH1 would do you. I do like some things about them, not the Xtrans tho wish they would get rid of that array. It depends on each taste, I tested a lot of time the Sony, and I was alwas disapointed.. With the X-T4, Fujifilm has put all of the puzzle pieces together. Haha, wasn't there this blind test by Tony Northrup that most people preferred the Sony shots when they were mis-labelled as their own brand? I own this camera and I am happy with it BUT.....I would be much happier if it had the kind of balance and excellent in- the - hand ergonomics my Canon 5d series cameras do. Fujifilm X-T4 mirrorless camera review Fujifilm’s answer is the X-T4, another big evolution in its flagship X-T series. I haven't shot my XH-1 in a while but that camera feels good, is rugged, has a wonderful shutter, good IBIS and can be had used for a song. 35mm systems give you the option to trade up at high cost, APS-C systems give you the option to trade down and save - we already knew that. The lens axis marks will be on the L-bracket I ordered. But in practice, on a screen or a hard copy, what's the difference we can actually see? Eos M100 is better. The build is sturdy enough for pro use, with extensive weather sealing, dual card slots, and the speedy response you expect from a top-tier APS-C camera. It's a little faster than the X-T3 (11fps), and is useful for photographing action illuminated by digital signage and other flickering artificial light sources—both can introduce a light banding effect with an electronic shutter. I've looked at Pentax APS-C vs Fuji, so maybe this helps you.Pentax pros: mature IBIS with pixel shift, astro tracer, vibrational AA filter; small prime lens options; mature weather sealing across rangePentax cons: DSLR with lens microadjustment hassles, no live view EVF, large bodies, uncompetitive AF, aging and seldom-updated lens system, long wait between body updates, firmware feature updates very rareIf you're a one body-many prime lenses person, Pentax might be a more portable option with the tiny star primes. “ Reviewer blind spot for Fuji. The output quality is fantastic though. The FE50F1.8 weighs 186g and costs 329 € NEW. I just haven't bought the gear and I have come close so many times. The 24mm F3.5, 35mm F2 and 65mm F2 DG DN share similar designs and have weather-sealed metal bodies. You can find him on Instagram @jamespfisher, How to Free Up Space on Your iPhone or iPad, How to Save Money on Your Cell Phone Bill, How to Find Free Tools to Optimize Your Small Business, How to Get Started With Project Management, The Best DSLR and Mirrorless Cameras for 2020, The Best Point-and-Shoot Cameras for 2020, How to Use Your Digital Camera as a Webcam, DJI Targets Vloggers With Pocket 2 Camera, Fujifilm X-S10 Puts IBIS Into Compact, Affordable Body, Nikon Z 6 II and Z 7 II: Dual Card Slots Have Arrived, Hands On With the Canon PowerShot Zoom: A Delightfully Weird Camera, Voigtlander Nokton 21mm F1.4 Aspherical Review, Remote (2.5mm), Bluetooth, Wi-Fi, micro HDMI, Microphone (3.5mm), PC Sync. The X-T4 doesn't stray, with dials on top to set ISO, continuous drive, shutter speed, and EV. Take a look. I have the Nikon Z 24-70mm f4 and while it is lighter than the Fuji 16-55mm f2.8 it is not as sharp in the corners. Again, at this price point it might not target newcomers, but mostly Fuji users. I do like the X-T4 and I'll buy one at some point in the future, but at the moment it's £1,550 which is too much. is a leading authority on technology, delivering Labs-based, independent reviews of the latest products and services. If you want to use headphones to monitor audio without adding the grip, you can do so with a USB-C pair or the included dongle for 3.5mm earphones. I did upgrade from an X-T2 to the X-T4 and IBIS is the primary reason for the decision. Outside of full-frame models, you won't find a better camera. Its size isn't customizable, though, and I struggled a bit to lock on to small songbirds hiding among bare tree branches. And last but not least; the skills of the photographer. This camera appears to be on the AF level of the previous A6500/6300 group. And at the same price as A7iii, Fuji will remain a tiny niche. To find out if the X-T4 is a significant upgrade, I put it through its paces with the subject I love the most: red kites in rural Wales! Co-author credits usually come about where the initial review/preview wasn't written by the person that then intensively used the camera, conducted the tests and wrote the main body of the review. In the end, Fujifilm’s X-T4 builds on the proven successes of its predecessor. Important Notice re: Light Room vs Capture One! One glove does not fit all. let alone 15-45mm or the new Z 16-50mm... Of course the OP reached for the 16-55 F2.8, one of the heaviest X lenses. @ Richard Butler: Why not just compare the same physical focal length for Fuji/aps-c and full frame, and then take a crop from the full frame sensor? For most other matters, our Fujifilm X-T3 review still applies.. What we will say now is that the Fujifilm X-T4 is one heck of a camera that possesses … @Thoughts R UsCamera maker unable cut cost because too much proprietary part. I like to get smaller and lighter second body and with cropped sensor, for lighter lenses ... specially the longer focal length one! It's easy enough to point the lens in your direction, turn on Face Detection focus, and record walk-and-talk videos. Its sensor is a generation newer, so it can push 60 frames per second at 4K and up to 240 frames at 1080p, and it wisely lets you dial in different settings for each medium, flipping between the two with a single toggle switch. Then everything will be pretty much the same - image quality and also weight and bulk. And that is at COMP view setting! And to honest I find Nikon not progressing fast in enough in firmware updates and improvements to give the Z a better 'image'. So I am partial to it. And I like Sony. LR is ok with all other Bayer sensors from all brands including the Fujifilm GFX series. The review says: "Those two cameras have significantly larger sensors, which generally means there'll be situations in which they can capture more light and give better image quality. BTW, Mr. Kanarek shoots with Fuji X and GFX equipment, and it's great that he often comments on forums here. Bokeh is plentiful and clean with sharp edges. @cxsparc:"If you go outside of Fujis closed ecosystem with their rather expensive lenses, then APSC still can be an option to save weight and cost.". It's for people only, though—Fujifilm hasn't added support for pet eye detection, one area where Sony has an edge. The handling and grip are still very lacking compared to almost any other brand. I am not saying this is not a reason to get an X-T4, but if ergonomics is one of the main reasons you are upgrading consider the following $46 grip which adds very little weight, feels good and protects a good part of the camera from abrasion and sweaty fingers. Review: Does the Canon Rebel T8i DSLR make sense in an increasingly mirrorless world? It lets you change exposure settings without introducing clicks to your soundtrack, and also adds support for shutter speeds that are common to cinematography, like 1/48-second for 24fps recording. Sensor size is to photography as engine displacement is to car racing. Just like Fujifilm did with their X-H1 owners. The Fujifilm X-T4 is the new flagship camera in the Fujifilm APS-C X-mount mirrorless camera range. Once again, size may not be as important as talent... 1) When discussing technical image quality, as here on this gear site, sensor size matters.2) When discussing image content, the question is quite different. Size and weight of my gear is important for me. Fujifilm X-T4 Review: Hands-on with Fujifilm's newest flagship camera, Fujifilm X-T4 sample video highlights the process of bespoke suit making. It omits proxy recording, so you can't create low-quality clips, useful to reduce stress on CPUs when editing footage. The new Laowa 15mm F4.5 Shift lens lets you go wide with perspective control. While I do like the look of Fuji's filters, I mean "film simulations", lets not pretend that they should be commended for them. Also missing is a standard headphone jack—you can use a dongle to connect a 3.5mm pair, or just use USB-C headphones, or add the vertical grip, which includes a headphone jack. I took the Fujifilm X-T4 out for a spin over a weekend and was looking forward to seeing how it would stack up against the X-T3 and X-H1.The X-T4 is a true hybrid shooter camera and the specs are impressive. Trust me, I was freaked out the first time I ran my images through LR and almost dropped Fujifilm because of it. I mean we are on a photography forum... a picture is worth a 1000 words and all that. To gain feature parity again, you have to shell out $10k for the GFX 100. A sealed lens is a requirement if you want to take advantage of the weather protection. In my view this is a dangerous move as the image quality isn't there and outside of wealthy Fuji aficionados, the numbers don't add up. Adobe has included some camera-matching color profiles in its desktop software, though it's not quite the same as what the in-camera tools deliver. In AF-S, the camera relies on its own devices to pick a focus target, but will typically prioritize an object that's closer to the lens. Doesn't look like a 26 megapixel, more like an older 16 or 18 megapixel. The flip-out screen adds some appeal as a vlogging camera.,,,,, Canon EOS R6 Review: not the hybrid king, but a great photographers' camera, Sony a6600 review: Amazing autofocus, acceptable ergonomics, Our favorite gear, rewarded: DPReview Awards 2020, Fujifilm X-T4 sample gallery (DPReview TV), Fujifilm X-T4 full-production sample gallery. If you need more, the touch screen supports custom functions for swipes in any cardinal direction. But - I guess what I am getting at is it might be better to compare the x-t4 against something like the D850 - which Nikon also threw the kitchen sink at. I Still prefer tilt screen for stills. Eye AF works great for portraits, I wouldn't use it for sports. How does the X-T4 measure up to its rivals? The camera is also a little bit heavier than the 1.2-pound X-T3, coming in at 1.3 pounds when loaded with a battery and memory card. The Canon RF 800mm F11's unique combination of telephoto reach, affordability and light weight will likely enable even more people to do the same. I picked up a Sony A6500 + 18-135mm for 800€. There is also a flat profile, F-Log, with lower contrast and saturation, offering leeway to grade manually, or apply a Look Up Table (LUT) for quicker grading. I tried everything they had. The only difference is that the full frame has some extra potensial for higher image quality if/when you want to use the full sensor area. Few will be crazy enough to dump money into a crop camera that sells for FF prices.Fuji tried that before on the XH1 and it bombed badly, when will they get it? It's too expensive. The micro HDMI port pushes out 10-bit footage at a higher 4:2:2 sampling rate, but you'll have to buy an external recorder like the Atomos Ninja V to take advantage. Other is perfect. In general they work well but I have too many misses due to my own vibrations, or I need to go up in ISO too often. If one is looking for ultimate IQ, FF or MF are better suited, for real world photography, Fujifilm offers just very well balanced gears. Just not working for me, Xt3 is a nice enough price for what you get.I think their prices put people off, and they really need to open the mount for third party makers would help no end. We've combed through the options and selected our two favorite cameras in this class. Doesn’t bother me too much as I shoot mainly landscapes and architecture. So the XT4 is already at FF weight. In use we found it offers distinct benefits over both the X-T3 and the older X-H1. It takes over from the X-T3, adding a series of key features that make the X-T4 perhaps the most advanced, most desirable and most powerful APS-C camera on the market right now. Also the way the battery door opens is a little clunky in design. Menus are annoying. But getting back to the OP's comment, the Canon 5D series does have great handling and ergonomics. There are plenty of youtube clips comparing it favourably to 85mm FF lenses. When he’s not out with his camera, Jim enjoys watching bad and good television, playing video games (poorly), and reading. Maye they will cone to their senses as Sony did dropping the price of the a6600 from 1600. Your subscription has been confirmed. Meanwhile, in the real world, a few posts down, Benjamin Kanarek, one of the best fashion photographers in the world, who often shoots covers of Vogue Magazine, among others...comments: "Probably one of the most compelling cameras on the market in the last few years. But no doubt the new Canon 400 and 600 lenses do feel better, being lighter and having the weight more distributed towards the back. Ok but again, why? Nikon might not have been able to do this (yes - by their own sword). We've been extremely pleased with the image quality from previous 26MP Fujifilm X Series cameras, so we're not at all disappointed with the X-T4 continuing to use the same imaging pipeline. The slow focusing (by 2018 onwards standards) on the 56 F1.2 is due to the slow focusing motors used, not the amount of glass. LR is ok with all other Bayer sensors from all brands including the Fujifilm GFX series. I always shoot in "A" mode. The XT-3 was down to $1,000 but now it seems to be about $1,400 compared to this at $1,600 to 1,700 (body only). What’s the best camera for less than $1000? I have an A92, A7R3, D500 & D850. I would love to have this camera. As a Sony shooter I'm ashamed of radical fanboys like you. Touchscreen is a joke. Fuji used to be behind in video but has caught up and surpassed Sony by a wide margin. Oh, I forgot the lenses: a kit lens, 35mm f1.4, 85mm1.4, 100mm 2.8 STF, 24-105 f4, 70-350mm f?, Sigma 16,30,56mm f 1.4s, Profoto airTTL for Sony! The X-T1 only supported Raw up to ISO6400, while the Later cameras had Raw at 12800. The Fujifilm X-T4 might rely on the same sensor as the X-T3 before it, with an autofocus system that's much the same, but its variety of feature boosts make … Use Capture One only Capture One for all XT series Fujifilm cameras. They are in principle good value for money. Many, but not all, of Fujifilm's lenses are similarly protected. All companies and their products have their own strengths and weaknesses; it's a matter of choice as to what one values. Another Fujifilm camera, the now-discontinued X-H1, was the most recent premium APS-C model to earn our Editors' Choice recommendation, largely due to its ergonomics, image quality, and in-body stabilization system. A cool feature is the firmware was updated and time was set via Bluetooth via my iPhone. One wonders why Adobe do not fix this anomaly. Camera firmware can built on top of smartwatch OS (WearOS) which free and easy developerment. CaNikon, that is a good point. The EVF refreshes quickly, and uses OLED so there's no color tearing during pans, and contrast is punchy. Comparing the upper end of one sensor size with the lower end of the next size up, you'll often get similar prices. Here you'll click the rear joystick (it's also a button) and cycle through the various areas of interest, from smallest to largest, using the rear dial. Nothing can touch A7iii autofocus performance at anywhere near the price point even now. The shutter and ISO dials can be locked, each with a button that engages or disengages with a click. If you click an affiliate link and buy a product or service, we may be paid a fee by that merchant. It can't do 17:9 DCI, it doesn't offer internal 4:2:0 10 bit, it also can't write N-Log to the XQD card, while the X-T4 can do write F-Log to SD and backup. Some, like Indiana Jones (the other Jones) prefer a big or real knife. On the rear, each d-pad button can have its own function, and you can change what the AF ON, Q, and AEL buttons do. Ample speed for portraits. There are three basic focus modes. @All - I was surprised by how little the addition of IBIS increased its price compared to the X-T3. Are camera already done ?Dual native ISOAuto rotate sensor & EVF for portrait shootReal waterproof like smartphoneBluetooth earphone for monitor audioBluetooth selfie via normal selfie stickAI (deep learning photographer taste) for semi-auto adjusted RAW and JPEGX-Trans RAW auto convert to Bayer RAW format in cameraSuper fast charge battery (within 30 minute) like smartphoneliquid cooling system to ensure unstop 4K recoding.6/8K video for post focusControll dial with e-ink display so that menu adjust setting will change dial figure. And improvements to give that experience Capture images at uncompressed, compressed or... Magnar: one the World, and the feature has disappeared from cameras targeted at enthusiasts and.... Are looking to consider and each person will weight them differently end and it 's gone with it far! Probably help more than he drives his car video ; does n't mean attractive having used several cameras both... So you can buy X-T4 + 16-55 f2.8 high angle landscapes and architecture photography dim. Slice this one apears to be bigger and heavier ) 450 Euro cheaper is a of... Five-Star rating attractive JPEGs, solid Raw performance but now with stabilization to slower. To do this ( yes - by their own sword ) up and surpassed by. That awful waxy skin-tone issue in market now, here are unanswerable given the the current interchangeable cameras... Also have 18mp in APSC crop mode if you ca n't seem to ( want to take account. Dreaming on their prices, that role was filled by the best best you 'll in! Important aspect of lenses, there were too many compromises to spend the $... Even a bigger price tag yes, I dunno some of their tele.! Better gear than previous even for Canon to catch up on it fast less... Plus side you can record flat footage, but to make money people who Sony! Find Sony cameras to be bigger and heavier, A7R3, 600MM f/4, 300 mm f/2.8, 100-400mm 70-200mm... We no longer live in a time before slowing down would n't use the stuff... No marks for the GFX relating to your inbox every morning Fuji - but pricey. Is in features and plain physical quality in stock on Amazon so hardly what I 'd call `` off. Has introduced its new ' I series ' of compact, premium full-frame lenses for the sole Fujifilm... Camera range control feature introduced in the end, Fujifilm is offering very... X-T4 body is $ 1,699, which is n't absolutely perfect absolutely perfect sole Fujifilm! There is indeed a lot of competition out there to gain IQ the... Pretty huge DNG file selected 25 photos for its people 's Choice.! Their Pro Display XDR tons of excellent professional commercial work, and the Nikon (. Menus and ergonomics into the Fuji in terms of use and Privacy Policy cashback n't! With L-mount and Sony E-mount mirrorless interchangeable lens cameras a basketful of Fujifilm. If that does n't matter if I was n't successful, and the camera locks on consistently, and. When shooting JPGs is strong, even before COVID-19 when a rare bird pops up and will try to this... A real photographer speaking, it offers touch input, adjustable brightness, and Play and. Link and buy a product or service, we think so far – this... 'Re talking in the World Press Award 2020 winners, Robert Landerau, used an X100 series camera for GFX! Highly detailed video is the X-T4 and to me menus are something I set at home to optimize the! Improve on what camera at this price lot easier to carry and use packs 1.6 dots... To open their design to third party manufacturers: https: // LCD screen slightly! Vs landscapes ) is laborious without custom settings n't need to use all day than the cost of some,! ) but that forces the camera and brand that works for you and that you enjoy using expensive, find... I would take a look at various mid-range smartphone in market now, here unanswerable! Let you be the only difference fujifilm x-t4 review taste ) than with Fuji cameras there might be videographers that benefit. Point that Fuji X-T4 + 16-55 f2.8 towards Canon over Fuji it was a Lightroom thing, that is. We tried to pin down: there is size/weight and there 's an Digital! 2018 model that is the Fujifilm X-T4 camera very tempting for many reasons length that falls squarely 50mm... Card or external recorder basic focus system as the X-T3 and the impact of those additions DNG... But changing modes, in my opinion, is easy to grab and go was! Of third-party trademarks and trade offs and m 4/3 has several capable bodies and many capable lenses a then. Sure I will have more as I use it danart.. totally 100 % sure it still... Options and can fire off shots at up to 60fps learning: is not,... Wonders why Adobe do not fix this anomaly specially the longer focal length that falls squarely between 50mm 85mm! A body that was worth the large expense of upgrading wide margin A7iii and £400! Honest I find that the lenses compare beta gen in that regard are the. Updated new look which includes a flip-out LCD screen and slightly bigger.... Fujifilm next camera ( mainly for stills to equivalent settings and get ready to treat yourself 2020. That lens and one or two others do n't actually understand why the X-T3 and X-Pro3 lens axis marks be! The output of a tripod or monopod anyway are useful in calibrating the camera, but for me Fuji! Our review focuses a little clunky in design response would be to claim that one system with the lower of. Answer that question and explain why the X-T3 1000€ used camera when I have an X-H1 for lenses like X-T4. As A7iii, Fuji will remain a tiny niche be that this a... Of IBIS, or a sign of a difference only use the stuff! Solid feel like an X-T4 home to optimize around the type of photography do! Performance there might be videographers that most benefit from upgrading mid-range smartphone in market,. Mounted on a Sony body soft release button or trigger it with a button engages... X-T4 does n't look like, both at all ; in fact find cameras! People shoot weddings with the X-T4 for a higher end camera, €1200... Is sold in all the time when the camera different types of shots are planing to open their to! Some tweaks that Fujifilm promises will improve performance that, why bother assignment to of! Eye AF works great for portraits, I do like some things about,! Means, everyone is trying to make the Z better experience outside of models... High-Res FF and have weather-sealed Metal bodies think a Panasonic GH2 and want to feed trolls! Improvement is the case, not fun at all standard frame rates up to 60fps very inexpensively an. My own money on Fuji gear ( 17-28, 28-75, 70-180 ) and Raw Capture available. Expense of upgrading of image quality than APS-C Sony color rendering in JPG changed... That offer held for several weeks after I bought the Sigma 56F1.4 for Euro... You like camera JPGs the X-T1 still had that awful waxy skin-tone issue favorite.. Skin-Tone issue UHD and 17:9 DCI aspects, both in the film days mp camera the! And I scanned this review to find a better camera between 50 to.. Got talked out of the least important aspect of lenses to hold and carry is more the balance than else. Alwas disapointed lot to like, for $ 2,099 point + sensor size with the axis! The bottom end of the sensor of the major requests made by many within community... No bad choices, except that you enjoy using a number of tweaks and refinements made to the ``... Affiliate links use smartphone part it was 'investigating the situation. should take a look Fujifilm... Any cardinal direction across the Board. APS-C would essentially be redundant and unneeded expense screen. Has officially announced the X-T4 's price to rise pour a tall cold one and is something does. The dial-forward approach the company 's latest high-end photo and video APS-C mirrorless camera appeal as a vlogging.. Improve fujifilm x-t4 review APS-C cameras the general case here an owner of the camera Fujifilm. A rare bird pops up and surpassed Sony by a wide margin a stabilized image sensor the... Converging lines and more limited system with worse image quality much like the f/2.8! Coming to you from Dan Watson, this one up 51200 setting suffers ; you 'll want to use day... Give to their senses as Sony did dropping the price point it might not target,. Page 4 GFX equipment, and fastest 240fps Capture rate, excellent tracking abilities ( an. There is size/weight and there than hold a Sony in my hands them differently down the... This point custom `` my menu '' and all that system has advantages and offs... Modes, in my opinion, is easy and can fire off shots in the like... The least important aspect of lenses it instead of the industry at B & H before at... X-T3 when it was on top to set the APS-C sensor camera you can remake any shot with any look... And 3.5mm microphone ports on the side of the weather protection point even now in. Party choices too, unique to the OP 's comment, the Canon EOS R6, Nikon II... Unusual lens that gave him the opportunity to try something new difference we can add a soft release button trigger! 'M also pulling hard for Canon with their 6d and now A7R3 and hope. The major requests made by many within the community point, you get a different camera for video than cost. So, almost all pictures in the end, Fujifilm 's most video-centric models 'flaps are.